Most people assume renewable energy is free. But it costs more and produces less relative to fossil fuels and uranium.
Unless we create nuclear power trucks and drilling, we'll always need fossil fuels for mining.
We already have a supply deficit in many critical minerals like copper. The renewable energy requires an astronomical amount more than we currently need. How will increasing the demand and reducing the supply solve anything?
Renewables at that stage of technological advancement are more of a lever to funnel money and power than to create energy and economic value.
Nonetheless, the physical reality eventually trumps even the most absurd narrative. Fossil fuels and nuclear are here to stay for much longer than projected by the greenwashed cultists.
Excellent analysis.
Most people assume renewable energy is free. But it costs more and produces less relative to fossil fuels and uranium.
Unless we create nuclear power trucks and drilling, we'll always need fossil fuels for mining.
We already have a supply deficit in many critical minerals like copper. The renewable energy requires an astronomical amount more than we currently need. How will increasing the demand and reducing the supply solve anything?
Thanks for your kind comment.
Renewables at that stage of technological advancement are more of a lever to funnel money and power than to create energy and economic value.
Nonetheless, the physical reality eventually trumps even the most absurd narrative. Fossil fuels and nuclear are here to stay for much longer than projected by the greenwashed cultists.
That’s why we have an opportunity is nuclear and fossil fuels and shipping of resources.
That's true. Energy and mining (and all related "pick and shovel" niches) will eventually pay off for the risk taken by industrious investors.
Short, precise, and to the point with great visuals. Well done!
Thanks for your kind words.